Friday, November 21, 2025

Blue Moon DS


Movies

Richard Linklater’s Two Delightful New Movies Have Him Trying Things He’s Never Done Before

The director’s dual artist biopics show different ways to keep the genre fresh.

By Dana Stevens

Oct 31, 20255:40 AM

Ethan Hawke as Lorenz Hart and Zoey Dutch as Jean Seberg in two recent Linklater biopics.

Photo illustration by Slate. Photos by Sony Pictures Classics and Netflix.

The built-in paradox of the artist biopic is that, with rare exceptions, any film that tries to represent the life and creative process of a great artist will necessarily result in a less brilliant work than its subject would themself have produced. Ray, for one, is a fine example of the musical biopic, with a galvanic lead performance from Jamie Foxx, but can it hold up to Ray Charles’ 1960 recording of “Georgia on My Mind”? Last year’s A Complete Unknown featured a superb Timothée Chalamet as the young Bob Dylan, but no one would call James Mangold’s well-observed portrait of a folk musician on the verge of a creative breakthrough the cinematic equivalent of a Dylan ballad like “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall.” Every so often, a truly original filmmaker will tell the story of another artist’s life and creative process in such a way as to create a freestanding masterpiece: Andrei Tarkovsky’s Andrei Rublev, Max Ophüls’ Lola Montès, Mike Leigh’s Mr. Turner and Topsy-Turvy, Jane Campion’s Bright Star and An Angel at My Table (Leigh and Campion being among the rare directors to have pulled this feat off twice). But something about the biopic’s necessary subservience to the historical record of its subject’s life and work often consigns entries in this genre to middlebrow or even kitsch status.


Slate Pears

Read More

exp-customer-logo

In two sprightly new films out this October, writer-director Richard Linklater has found an idiosyncratic way to escape this biopic trap. Blue Moon, about a single night late in the life of the great mid-20th-century lyricist Lorenz Hart, and Nouvelle Vague, about the making of Jean-Luc Godard’s 1960 debut feature Breathless, each proposes in its own way the notion of the biopic as an act of criticism. Linklater’s evident admiration for the work of these artists has led him to make two films that set out to show audiences not necessarily who Hart and Godard were as human beings (we never see either at home, for example) but why we should care about the work they made, those songs and movies that are still actively shaping how we see and hear our world, whether we’re aware of their influence or not.


Advertisement

The films could be seen as contrapuntal companion pieces that play out their related themes in separate but complementary rhythms. Nouvelle Vague darts forward at the effervescent pace of the cultural youth movement it chronicles, while Blue Moon ambles and digresses, casting the occasional rueful backward glance at an earlier and more fulfilling time in its middle-aged hero’s declining career. The characters of Hart, as played by Linklater’s longtime creative collaborator Ethan Hawke, and Godard, as played by newcomer Guillaume Marbeck—a professional photographer making his first appearance in a feature film—have some important qualities in common. Distinct though their styles are, they share an irreverent wit and a keen awareness of their own outsider status in the entertainment industry. Both men display a chip-on-the-shoulder confidence that barely masks a deep insecurity. Both relate to their surroundings and to their work with an uneasy mix of romantic idealism and self-protective sarcasm. Above all, both are driven by the sense that the art form they love, and to which they each believe they have a unique contribution to make, is failing to live up to the standards they insist on holding it to. Hart’s introspective melancholy and Godard’s restless kineticism are presented as equally valid modes of approaching the creative process, one suited to youth, the other to age.


Advertisement

Of the two movies, Blue Moon feels like the more major entry in the director’s filmography, if only because it marks a new epoch in his ever-evolving partnership with Hawke. For more than a decade, the two have been reading over and talking about the script by Robert Kaplow, a novelist and former high school English teacher whose book Me and Orson Welles Linklater adapted to the screen in 2008. When Linklater first brought the script to Hawke, they agreed the actor was too young to play the lyricist, who on the day the film is set—March 31, 1943, the date of the Broadway premiere of Oklahoma!—is 47 years old, and a particularly careworn and alcohol-soaked 47 at that. But even as Hawke was aging in front of the camera over the course of Linklater’s decades-sprawling Before trilogy and the even more time-bending, 12-years-in-the-making experiment Boyhood, the actor was growing both physically and artistically into the performer who could take on Lorenz Hart, the most transformative role of his career thus far.


Advertisement

Even in the most demanding of Hawke’s performances—I’m thinking of his searing turn as a tormented priest in the great Paul Schrader drama First Reformed—we’re used to seeing the actor as some variation of himself: scruffy, earnest, somehow boyish even deep into adulthood, a slightly more grizzled version of the handsome leading man he played in Gen X comedies like Reality Bites or, yes, Before Sunrise. The character he inhabits here is a radical shift away from that territory. Hart was a tiny man, around 5 feet tall, and his self-consciousness about his height, his thinning hair, and his generally unprepossessing appearance permeates every moment of Hawke’s time on-screen. (Linklater, Hawke, and the crew worked with Latham Gaines, a friend and former collaborator of Hawke’s billed in the credits as the film’s “height wizard,” to create the illusion of Hart’s small stature using practical effects that included trenches dug into the soundstage.) Hart was also a gay man—albeit one who experienced painful crushes on women as well, and proposed marriage to three of them—at a time when queer desire had to be spoken of in code even in the milieu of New York musical theater. Hawke’s performance conveys all that: Hart’s discomfort in his own body, his internalized homophobia and alcoholic self-destructiveness, but also the deep joy he finds in language (he’s always pausing to note his approval of individual word choices, many of them his own), in music, and in all forms of beauty.


Advertisement

Blue Moon takes place in a single location in just under two hours of real time; in essence, it’s the story of a man sitting in a bar (the venerable Broadway watering hole Sardi’s) over the course of one evening, alternately charming and boring whoever he encounters with a steady stream of observational chatter and self-deprecating wit. But Kaplow’s script neatly avoids both claustrophobia and staginess, dividing the story into three discrete acts. First, in a nearly empty bar, Hart puts on his one-man show for the bartender (Bobby Cannavale), the house pianist (Jonah Lees), and another bar patron (Patrick Kennedy), a quietly observant fellow who turns out to be the New Yorker essayist and children’s book author E.B. White. Then—after briefly greeting his latest object of unrequited longing, a Yale sophomore named Elizabeth (Margaret Qualley) who’s arrived to help set up the after-party for Oklahoma!’s opening night—Hart has an extended encounter with his longtime songwriting partner Richard Rodgers (Andrew Scott), fresh from the glowing reception of his first musical co-written with Oscar Hammerstein II (Simon Delaney).


Advertisement

The audience, watching in 2025, knows that Rodgers and Hammerstein will go on to become the most successful musical-theater duo of the next half-century. Hart, too, with a clarity born of his own self-loathing, senses that his moment in the spotlight has passed. Hammerstein’s broader, more sentimental lyrics, with their “corn as high as an elephant’s eye”—a line from Oklahoma! that Hart quotes to White with a shudder—have picked up the baton from Hart’s intricate, internally rhymed lines (“I’m wild again / Beguiled again / A simpering, whimpering child again”). The melancholy urbanity that makes songs like “My Funny Valentine,” “I Didn’t Know What Time It Was,” and “Isn’t It Romantic?” now sound like timeless classics was precisely what made them seem dated at the height of the Second World War.


In Blue Moon’s final act—though the three sections flow into each other seamlessly, with no clean breaks in between—Hart and his coed crush withdraw into the Sardi’s coatroom for a private moment that’s less romantic than it is conspiratorial. For me, this stretch was the weakest part of the movie, mainly because Qualley seems profoundly miscast in the role of Elizabeth (a character based on a real-life college student with whom Hart maintained a correspondence). Her character is meant to be 20 years old, with artistic ambitions but little experience; Qualley, on the other hand, is 31 years old, with all the poise of the gorgeous movie star she is. This isn’t exactly a critique of Qualley’s performance: I just wish that Linklater, who has often shown himself to be adept at casting unknown and sometimes nonprofessional actors in major roles (think of Ellar Coltrane, the unforgettable child-to-teenager star of Boyhood) had sought out a less famous face, someone who came across less as a sexy and self-possessed woman than as a brash and precocious but still-unformed girl. When Qualley’s Elizabeth entertains the enthralled Hart by recounting her botched hookup with an oafish frat boy, it’s hard to imagine the commanding young woman she presents as having such an abject sexual experience.


Advertisement

Related From Slate


Ellin Stein

The Greatest Divorce in Broadway History Is the Subject of a New Movie. But Was It Really That Brutal?

Read More

Be that as it may, Hart’s age-inappropriate crush on Elizabeth is not reciprocated, remaining in the realm of idealized courtly love. Hart’s passing fixation on this particular young woman, we’re led to see, is just one symptom of the self-destructive romanticism that has also contributed to his alcoholism, an addiction that—as we know from the heartrending flash-forward with which the movie opens—will very soon put an end to both his songwriting career and his life.


The conversation between youth and age is also a major theme in Nouvelle Vague, even though virtually every character in the movie is young; the figure who observes their antics from the wiser but sadder perspective of middle age is none other than the off-screen Linklater. (The script is by Holly Gent and Vincent Palmo, adapted and translated into French by Michèle Halberstadt and Laetitia Masson.) Indeed, the studiedly laconic Godard, whom we first catch sight of watching a movie in the black sunglasses he never removes, is ashamed to be the late bloomer in his cinephile circle, having not yet made a feature film at the advanced age of 28. Witnessing the success of his friend François Truffaut (Adrien Rouyard), with The 400 Blows, at the Cannes film festival—a trip he steals money from the Cahiers du Cinéma petty-cash box to make—the apparently unbothered but secretly competitive Godard vows to scare up the minimal budget needed to make a movie that, as he brashly assures his concerned producer Georges de Beauregard (Bruno Dreyfürst), will change the course of film history.


Advertisement

True, Godard has no shooting script to speak of, asks his cameraman Raoul Coutard (Matthieu Penchinat) to use a camera so noisy it rules out the possibility of synced sound, and observes a work schedule so chaotic that the director sometimes sends his cast and crew home after getting just one shot, or blows off a whole day of filming to play pinball alone in a café. But the producers, like Godard’s initially dubious cast and crew, begin to see the method in this headstrong young man’s madness once he finally assembles the “girl and a gun” that, in his own formulation, are all that’s needed to make a movie. The filming of Breathless took place mainly in the streets of Paris, without permits from the city, in a guerrilla-style rush that lends the film its jagged, electric energy.


What we see here are the moments just before and after Coutard’s noisy camera begins to roll, as stars Jean-Paul Belmondo (played by dead ringer Aubry Dullin) and Jean Seberg (marvelously embodied by Zoey Deutch) struggle to comprehend the demands of their mercurial director. Why does he want them to read long literary passages into the camera and re-create their favorite moments in Humphrey Bogart movies? Seberg in particular, fresh from working with the notoriously overbearing Otto Preminger, is unsettled by her new director’s lack of concern with such trifles as continuity editing and scripted dialogue. A late scene in which the crew shoots Breathless’ ending includes a sly speculation that the movie’s closing image emerged from a conflict between actress and director, with Seberg’s ambiguous improvised gesture winning the day over Godard’s more downbeat suggestion.


Advertisement

Recommended for You


I Thought I’d Already Experienced All Sex With My Husband Had to Offer. Then Six Months Ago, Everything Changed.


It Feels as if Liberal Justices Are Powerless. But Their Dissents Can Actually Get Us Out of This.


Trump’s Plan for a Secret Police Force Loyal to Him Alone Isn’t Playing Well in Court

Filmed in black and white in the old-fashioned 1:37 “Academy ratio,” with the atmosphere of mid-20th-century Paris impeccably re-created by means of too-subtle-to-spot digital effects, Nouvelle Vague is an hour-and-45-minute-long bagatelle that goes down as easy as a café crème at a standup counter, and provides a bigger burst of energy. Linklater has fun pastiching some of Godard’s signature stylistic techniques (the choppy edits, the direct-to-camera gaze), and the dialogue, all in French, pingpongs along with the deadpan rapidity of early French New Wave. A crabby critic might note that the dramatic action in Nouvelle Vague lacks meaningful conflict; after all, everyone watching in 2025 knows that Godard is indeed making a masterpiece that will change film history, so whatever confrontations he has with producers, cast, and crew along the way come off as fairly low-stakes squabbles. But Nouvelle Vague is less a dramatization of the act of shooting Breathless than it is a celebration of youthful cinematic ambition—the same divine madness that sent the 29-year-old Linklater on an equally permit-less journey through the streets of Austin to shoot his own medium-reinventing breakthrough movie Slacker. Nouvelle Vague is an affectionate portrait of the artist as a young nutjob with absolute faith in his vision, and an invitation for creators of all kinds to believe in their own similarly implausible dreams. To borrow a phrase from Lorenz Hart—one that would apply just as well to the movie Linklater made about and for him—it’s a funny valentine.


Get the best of culture

Get the best of movies, TV, books, music, and more.

Email address:

Send me updates about Slate special offers.

By signing up, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms.

Sign Up

Copy Link

Share

Comment

France

Music

Biopics

Portrait Mode


David Bowie's daughter is one of the most beautiful women on the planet.

Articles Skill

|

Sponsored

Cher's son is probably the most handsome man in the world.

Articles Skill

|

Sponsored

Discover Bank-Owned Properties at Great Prices

New Bank Assets Available on the Market

Explore Topics Today

|

Sponsored

الأطباء مندهشون: حيلة بسيطة تخفف سنوات من آلام المفاصل (جرّبها الليلة).

العدو رقم واحد لآلام المفاصل

Artraid

|

Sponsored

I Need to Talk About the Weirdest Part of Epstein’s Emails—Besides, Uh, the Obvious

Slate Magazine

Read trends on dermatology-approved Ayurvedic care

Explore Ayurveda’s insights into skin types, dosha balance, and natural ways to maintain healthy radiance

Finpedias

|

Sponsored

Tips for Radiant Skin Health

Explore Ayurveda’s insights into skin types, dosha balance, and natural ways to maintain healthy radiance

Finpedias

|

Sponsored

MOST POPULAR

I Went to My Friend’s Expensive Destination Wedding. I Can’t Believe How They Repaid Me.

Slate Magazine

أطباء المسالك البولية: هذه العادة الليلية البسيطة يمكن أن تعزز حيوية الرجال

حياة صحية

|

Sponsored

Recommended For You


In Defense of Film’s Most Disparaged Genre


What’s Fact and What’s Fiction in Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere


My Boyfriend Has Something Most Guys Would Kill for. He Refuses to Use It On Me.


This Dissent From a Reagan Judge Is One of the Most Unhinged Judicial Opinions in U.S. History


The Greatest Divorce in Broadway History Is the Subject of a New Movie. But Was It Really That Brutal?


The Greatest Rock Album Ever Made About Growing Up


Taylor Swift Is On Top of the World. Why Is She Still Punching Down?


Every Year, I’ve Donated a Major Prize for My Company’s Holiday Raffle. That Stops Now.


The Movie of the Year Is Here


Two Oscar Hopefuls Show the Supposed Stories Behind Artistic Masterpieces. Only One Is Persuasive.


Only One Performer Has Won Three Best Actor Oscars. Is It Fair That He’s Also a Joke?


The Springsteen Movie Shows the Problem With Today’s Music Biopics


I’m a Poet. I Believe That This Song Is Taylor Swift’s Masterpiece. I’ll Explain Why.


Taylor Swift’s New Album Is a Masterpiece of Cringe


Two Auteurs Have New Thrillers Set in New York. They Paint Very Different Pictures of the City.


About

About Us

Work With Us

Contact

Pitch Guidelines

Send Us Tips

Corrections

Commenting

Reprints

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Group Subscriptions

Sign In

Account

Subscription FAQs

Podcast FAQs

Newsletters

Customer Support

Advertising

AdChoices

California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Opt-Out IconCookie Preferences

Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company.


Follow Us

 Facebook  X  Instagram  YouTube  RSS Feed

User Agreement

Privacy Policy

All contents © 2025 The Slate Group LLC. All rights reserved.

Sunday, September 14, 2025

 

FICTION

Writers behaving badly — a satire on MFA novels

In Emily Adrian’s novel Seduction Theory, a graduate student forces herself into the marriage of two creative writing professors
Portrait of Emily Adrian.
Emily Adrian teaches on the MFA programme at Sewanee, the University of the South

As the 21st century has trudged from mewling infancy to young adulthood, a new type of book has emerged, dominating bookshops and prize lists alike: the MFA novel. In the US there are well over 300 MFA — master of fine arts — programmes, which offer creative writing tuition from published authors and the chance to have your writing critiqued by experts and peers. More than 20,000 people apply to these degrees each year, and most of the students who are accepted shell out extortionate sums.

What does this mean for literature? In 2016 The Atlantic magazine got a computer to analyse the differences between novels by writers with MFAs and those without, and found that MFA novels contained more references to “lawns, lakes, counters, stomachs, and wrists”, which was not exactly groundbreaking.

Book cover for Emily Adrian's *Seduction Theory*.

In reality, the difference is tricky to pinpoint but MFA novelists tend towards lots of dialogue, arch plots and heavy helpings of irony. That doesn’t make them good or bad — the category is broad enough to include Kiley Reid (sparkling, witty, wonderful) and Ocean Vuong (meh) — but the typical offering can be well crafted but rather sterile.

Emily Adrian teaches on the MFA programme at Sewanee, the University of the South. And her fourth book for adults, Seduction Theory, might just be a skilful satire of the MFA novel. On page one we are told that we are reading Roberta Green’s “Thesis Submitted to Edwards University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Fine Arts”. But, at least at first, it’s easy to forget this metaliterary fact as we enjoy her sharp, clever story of two misbehaving academics.

Books newsletter
News, reviews, author interviews and suggested reads from our literary editors.

Simone and Ethan work at Edwards University, Londonville, as creative writing professors. Simone is the high-flyer in their marriage: her memoir Motherless, about the death of her mother, won her a tenured position (Ethan is the “spousal hire”). She is beautiful and cool, with “fifty-four thousand followers … [an] internet friendship with the creator and star of an HBO show … [a] nine-hundred-dollar slip dress she wore to the National Book Awards”.

Advertisement

Ethan, while attractive and reasonably talented, gives off a faint whiff of mediocrity. His own book, The Muse, might have won him a $250,000 advance, but it was all about Simone’s grief. And since it didn’t sell nearly enough copies to earn back the advance, his publisher has been avoiding him ever since: “He was aware of being a novelist who hadn’t sold a book since he was twenty-six.”

• What we’re reading this week — by the Times books team

Under these circumstances, it is both unbelievable and completely predictable that Ethan has a short-lived affair with his secretary, Abigail, a young single mother who has, he admits in spite of his lust, “crusty eyelashes and fleshy earlobes”. Will Simone ever forgive him?

But you’ve read that story before. What makes it interesting is that Simone has been secretly pushing the boundaries of her marriage and career through her friendship with a graduate student, one Roberta Green. The pair haven’t had sex, but they have been training for a marathon together, and sharing an office, a sofa and at one point even a shower. Poor Roberta falls painfully in love.

And so this thesis is, we discover halfway through, an elaborate act of literary revenge — and Roberta is an utterly unreliable narrator. At one point Simone, enduring a bookshop event on a road trip with her unfaithful husband, contemplates dragging him into the bathroom and working things out on a more physical level. Until Roberta intrudes on the moment: “I will not saddle her with the indignity of the bathroom blowjob.” So did she do it or not? Is Roberta making it all up?

Advertisement

• Read more book reviews and interviews — and see what’s top of the Sunday Times Bestsellers List

The first two thirds of the novel, which picks apart the complicated marriage of Simone and Ethan, is deeply enjoyable. But once Roberta inserts herself in the narrative it all becomes increasingly claustrophobic. Perhaps she should have listened to the advice doled out by Simone in their first class together: “What Roberta’s story needs is less Roberta.” Paradoxically, Seduction Theory falls victim to the fatal flaw of the MFA novels it seems to satirise — being too clever by half.

Seduction Theory by Emily Adrian (Weidenfeld & Nicolson £18.99 pp224). To order a copy go to timesbookshop.co.uk. Free UK standard P&P on orders over £25. Special discount available for Times+ members

PROMOTED CONTENT